<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Royal Anecdotes &#187; Prince Harry</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.royalanecdotes.com/category/harry/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.royalanecdotes.com</link>
	<description>Royals, Royalty and British Monarchy by John Evans</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Mar 2010 13:55:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Has Prince William made a bad career move?</title>
		<link>http://www.royalanecdotes.com/2010/02/09/has-prince-william-made-a-bad-career-move/</link>
		<comments>http://www.royalanecdotes.com/2010/02/09/has-prince-william-made-a-bad-career-move/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 20:29:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Prince Harry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince William]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[RAF]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sea King]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search and Rescue]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.royalanecdotes.com/?p=776</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It has been announced in the South West of England tonight that the Search and Rescue operations at RAF Chivenor, covering North Cornwall and North Devon, are to be phased out during nighttime hours as a money-saving exercise.


A Sea King helicopter used by RAF Search and Rescue

The slack will be taken up by bases in [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.royalanecdotes.com/2010/02/09/has-prince-william-made-a-bad-career-move/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>74</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kate Middleton rumours untrue</title>
		<link>http://www.royalanecdotes.com/2009/07/26/kate-middleton-rumours-untrue/</link>
		<comments>http://www.royalanecdotes.com/2009/07/26/kate-middleton-rumours-untrue/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2009 15:35:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Balmoral]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kate Middleton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mario Testino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince Harry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince William]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Royal Engagment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.royalanecdotes.com/?p=753</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ I&#8217;m often asked why I don&#8217;t report on the many rumours zipping around about the endlessly ongoing relationship between Kate Middleton and Prince William.
The simple answer is that most of them are untrue.
Now Judy Wade of Hello! magazine has shot down another batch of these phantom birds.
First, the plausible sounding report that Kate and [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.royalanecdotes.com/2009/07/26/kate-middleton-rumours-untrue/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>48</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>William and Kate: an everlasting loop</title>
		<link>http://www.royalanecdotes.com/2009/05/13/william-and-kate-an-everlasting-loop/</link>
		<comments>http://www.royalanecdotes.com/2009/05/13/william-and-kate-an-everlasting-loop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 15:14:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Clarence House]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kate Middleton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Monarchy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince Harry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince William]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince of Wales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Royal Engagment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Royal Wedding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Queen]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.royalanecdotes.com/?p=747</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ So Prince William and Kate Middleton attended a polo match over the weekend and *gasp* he put his arm on her shoulder in a gesture of affection (pictured).
This is a couple who have been in and out of &#8220;going out&#8221; for so long, you almost have to be of the Queen Mother&#8217;s generation to [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.royalanecdotes.com/2009/05/13/william-and-kate-an-everlasting-loop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>321</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Has the Monarchy become boring?</title>
		<link>http://www.royalanecdotes.com/2009/04/09/has-the-monarchy-become-boring/</link>
		<comments>http://www.royalanecdotes.com/2009/04/09/has-the-monarchy-become-boring/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2009 14:44:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Chelsy Davy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Duchy of Cornwall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kate Middleton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince Harry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince William]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prince of Wales]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[St James's Palace]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Queen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Monarchy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Royalty]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.royalanecdotes.com/?p=736</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is a powerful school of thought that the Monarchy is best when it&#8217;s boring. 


Prince William and Prince Harry

I would prefer to say, it has a duty to be boring to the extent that boring doesn&#8217;t trip over the toes of politicians.
However, I don&#8217;t believe that boring should apply equally to members of the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.royalanecdotes.com/2009/04/09/has-the-monarchy-become-boring/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>64</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
