Syntagma Digital
LifeTimes
Main Page

Has the Monarchy become boring?

There is a powerful school of thought that the Monarchy is best when it’s boring.

Prince William and Prince Harry
Prince William and Prince Harry

I would prefer to say, it has a duty to be boring to the extent that boring doesn’t trip over the toes of politicians.

However, I don’t believe that boring should apply equally to members of the Royal Family whose job it is to help the Monarch embody and unify the nation. Boring and invisible are not known unifying forces.

At present the Royal Family is keeping a very low profile. Its future, the two 20-something Princes, are buried deep in the Armed Forces, except for occasional forays into charitable activities, which by necessity, are boring.

If you write about Monarchy and Royalty, as we do here, there are very few Royal stories around.

Kate Middleton has popped into a very black hole, possibly allowing her to fade from public notice with dignity. If she ever pops out permanently on the arm of Prince William, it will be deja vu all over again, as some wit put it. In other words, boring.

Chelsy Davy has reportedly had a few flings during her former boyfriend’s absence on flying duties. Holidays in South Africa without Harry, and a new job in a London law office beckon. Boring doesn’t begin to cover it.

Prince Charles and Camilla stagger from one overseas PR disaster to another, giving the impression of a ragged and disputatious marriage — which it probably isn’t. Well, not all of the time.

Oh, and Princess Beatrice has got a new plait on the top of her head. Hold the back page!

It couldn’t be more boring, could it?

This wholesale retreat from public life is said to be a way of sharing the public’s new-found poverty. Rightly, photos of drunken Princes swaying out of £100-a-shot nightclubs are strictly off-limits now.

The Princes’ new team at St James’s Palace can hardly be expected to come up with new publicity stories while the “boys” are in the military, training for future under-the-radar roles.

Has the Queen fallen into the same trap that caused such consternation when Diana died? Locking the family away in Balmoral, while half the country was heaving with grief, was understandable for an ordinary family, but not for Royalty. Monarchy needs to be visible at low points in the national life. Future popularity depends on it.

The new austerity is a wise choice, given the appalling attrition many families are facing across the country. But a bit of Royal magic would go down a treat now.

Do you have a view? 64 Comments

Slow news month for the Royal Family

I’m afraid the slow news month for the Royal Family continues into another.

Prince Harry
Prince Harry learns to fly

Prince William and Prince Harry are away learning to fly helicopters and their girlfriends have gone to ground. Chelsy Davy has broken off her relationship with Harry, while Kate Middleton seems to have popped into a black hole … again.

We hear that Harry has failed the first written test on his flying course and is receiving special tuition from his officers.

Lord “Freddie” Windsor has become engaged to Sophie Winkleman and will marry in September. Sophie played the irascible Princess Eleanor in The Palace, an irreverent, and almost unwatchable, ITV drama about a fictional British Royal Family, which appeared too close for comfort to the present one.

The Queen will soon have two Sophies to contend with: Sophie Wessex and Sophie Windsor.

A source said, “The first thing on the agenda is to get the parents to meet as they have not had the chance so far. Princess Michael is currently in South Africa but they’ll arrange a meeting as soon as she returns. Everybody is thrilled.”

Sophie’s father is Barry Winkleman, a publisher, and her mother, Cynthia Black, is a children’s author.

Prince Philip took a fall while carriage driving recently, suffering a badly strained back and knocks to his eyes and nose. Typically, he bounced back quickly and has resumed his busy engagement round.

Let us hope the Depression has not stifled all the activities of the Royals and those around them.

Do you have a view? 36 Comments

William and Harry: what happened next?

Tonight Channel 4 broadcast an explosive documentary about Prince William and Prince Harry.

Typically for Channel 4 it covered a lot of “toff” activities, like hunting and polo in a deliberately disparaging way, and hyped up every glitch and problem that the Princes endured in their youth.

More interesting were journalist Richard Kay, who was close to their mother Diana, and James Whitaker, the Mirror photographer and lately pundit on all things Royal.

Richard Kay suggested that William is using Kate Middleton as a kind of decoy to cover his other activities. Both Princes, he said, are reluctant Royals who don’t want to do the job.

Whitaker also pursued this line, saying that their decisions to continue in the military “were extraordinary” and indicated they were turning their back on Royal duties and, by implication, marriage.

William does not come out of this very well. We hear that Diana referred to Harry as King Henry because she felt he would be more able to handle the role.

Chelsy Davy’s recent split from Harry was spliced onto the end of the tape, but carried the same message: the Princes are not interested in settling down, and both girls now seem to be aware of that.

Royal Anecdotes has known this for some time, as regulars will know, but the most astonishing assertion, made by Richard Kay, is that Kate is a decoy for William’s private activities.

No doubt a lot of flak will be generated by this documentary, and by the main interviews in particular, so we will await the outcome without commenting further for the time being.

(Overseas readers may be able to watch it on the Catchup service under the title “What happened next”.)

Do you have a view? 173 Comments

Chelsy Davy splits from Prince Harry

Chelsy Davy It had to happen, especially after Prince Harry’s decision to devote himself to highly specialized military duties in the Army Air Corps.

Just as his brother, Prince William’s choice of a long stint in the RAF’s Search and Rescue squad all but sidelined long-term girlfriend Kate Middleton, Chelsy, the high-flying lawyer, has backed off and all but dumped the Prince.

It has been clear to Royal Anecdotes for some time that neither Prince was ready to make any commitment to their first lady loves.

Chelsy has clearly been cleverer than Kate in forging a serious career for herself. Her future now seems to be back in South Africa.

A military source is reported as saying, “Harry’s training is going to be seriously demanding and he has been told there will be little time for girlfriends and socialising. He is living in a modest room with a single bed and won’t be allowed to drink from Monday to Friday, and he will need to knuckle down.”

Although Chelsy had planned to join City law firm Allen & Overy after her graduation later this year, she has now told friends that South Africa beckons.

Plainly, Harry’s commitment to the Army has put a lot of pressure on her, since they don’t get much time together. A friend commented, “He’s told her it has to come before anything, and she’s a bit fed up of always coming second. She was prepared to make a big sacrifice by moving to the UK. She had her job lined up and a place to live in London. She’s a very bright girl who wants to be a successful lawyer, but that’s all up in the air now.”

The recent closeness of Chelsy with Kate Middleton may suggest that something similar is brewing between Kate and William. The reluctance of the second in line to the Throne to abolish her “Waity Katie” tag delivers its own message.

Both relationships have run their course. I would expect a similar announcement from the Middleton compound soon.

Unless, of course, William makes an executive decision. Why, then, did he choose the RAF over Kate?

Do you have a view? 29 Comments