135 Responses to “Kate Middleton engagement at Christmas”

1. You seem to think that KN has contacts both at BP and CH. I don’t believe so. She might have had once, but now her only sources are posters on royal forums and those who comment in her own paper. She hasn’t been right in anything for a long time. And she is bitter that her sources have dried up for some reason.
   I don’t believe that friend who told her about the engagement either. And I don’t think there are strong anti-Kate groups at the palaces. KN doesn’t have a clue what goes on inside the palaces any longer. She has adopeted the anti-Kate groups on the internet as her new “insiders”. She is such a sorry excuse for a journalist these days.

   By dagga on August 24th, 2008 at 3:38 pm

2. I agree with your sentiments John.
   Irrespective of what Katie Nicholls says, Kate is involved in organising a charity event for a children’s hospital together with several of William’s friends. It shows how poor a “journalist” Katie Nicholls is that she didn’t even find that official website. I think that’s exactly the sort of low profile involvement CH would support. I suspect her William, Harry and Chelsy will attend together. Here’s a link to the official website.
   http://rollerdisco.org/

   By Isana on August 24th, 2008 at 3:46 pm

3. John, thank you so for taking the time to post this and I do hope things dry up where you are.

   That is a brilliant theory you have, and seems highly plausible that Kate is simnply caught between two warring press offices right now. We know from the Charles and Diana saga that these two teams (at BP and CH) are often in contempt of each other, and sadly, that seems to be the case now.

   While I dreaded — absolutley abhored — the idea of William capitulating to public pressure I have since taken a different view that he must declare his attentions publicly so as to not cause any more harm to the reputation of his beloved.

   A Christmas announcement would achieve this. I cannot see any other alternative.

   By alsgal on August 24th, 2008 at 3:49 pm

4. John, thanks much for taking the time to share your perspective on the most recent Katie Nicholl article. Your ideas make a lot of sense to me.

   Isana, thanks for the link to Roller Disco. The list of organizers looks like a list of “who’s who” of their generation. Knowing the likelihood that Prince William & Kate will both be at the event, tickets should sell well. I would expect that press people also will be there, reporting on the evening, photos and all.

   By Evelyn on August 24th, 2008 at 7:35 pm

5. I think that the more negative the DM gets, the more it’ll drive William and Kate underground and justify their animosity towards the press. My case in point is that I haven’t read anything about them since the night at Rafles onthe internet. The press is still talking about that night. Can you imagine if you were wearing a dress, being blinded by the flashing cameras, hurried into the car, and all in 12 seconds? Who of us could have done any better than Kate? It is sometimesd hard enough without all of that going on around you. As long as Kate is a private person and dating William for so long, there will be these stories. It is driving the press into a tizzy. It could be that the two BP and CH have different views of the situation. It could be that William and Kate know that once they announce their engagement that they will have fewer private times. There will be pressure to immediately have children. In fact, I have seen 2 sites trying to figure out when they will have children. I hope that there is a Christmas engagement if not sooner. Hopefully then, the press will take a more positive point of view concerning the royal couple. Thanks for the article. It shows a very thoughtful view of the situation.

   By kat on August 24th, 2008 at 7:36 pm

6. The Prince of Wales website has announced that Prince William and Prince Harry will attend the royal world premiere of the new Bond film on October 29. Do you think they’ll take their girlfriends?

   By Evelyn on August 24th, 2008 at 7:46 pm

7. Call me crazy but I don’t think at this point Prince William and Kate, especially Wills as the more experienced one of the two at dealing with the media, are going to let the Daily Mail or any other tabloid dictate their decisions. And William certainly knows what being a public figure is all about- negative things get said & written about you in the papers. You get criticized sometimes for no reason at all other than a particular writer is bored and needs someone to pick on. They obviously have a plan that they’re sticking to & it drives some in the press crazy because they don’t know what it is. John offers a very interesting theory about BP vs. CH. The only problem is somebody like Katie Nicholl would never have access to that information. If the DM staff ever had any sources close to the royals they certainly don’t now. I mean if the News of the World, not exactly the most reliable tab, could find out about Kate’s upcoming charity role then it says volumes about Ms Nicholl and her supposed insider sources.

   By lizzy on August 24th, 2008 at 8:25 pm

8. This is becoming more and more of a farce on behalf of the DM. The way KN writes makes one believe she is actually jealous of Kate. It would make sense that the aides at CH may very well be advising Kate to do nothing this way it only makes the very lazy Camilla look good.

   Kate has tried work, and charity but it is impossible for her with the press intrusions and at this point the burden of her being a private citizen as they are not engaged. If at Christmas William makes his intentions clear Kate will have a clearer idea of what role and interests she can work at. But at this point all those who have not heard her speak let alone met her should back off and get a life.

   By Trudie on August 24th, 2008 at 10:09 pm

9. I agree with Trudie and also with John, although I hope that Prince Philip has had no hand in the intrigue that appears to be generated by the Palace toward Kate Middleton. In the early years of his marriage, Prince Philip intrigued in a Royal romance and the results were dreadful for the harmony within the Royal Family, causing collateral damage that lasted for years. Let us hope that he has moved past the need to interfere with the relationships of others. Katie Nicholls is both annoying and unprofessional and is significantly reducing the credibility of the Daily Mail. I avoid reading her articles for the sake of my blood pressure and my equanimity.

   By Gigi on August 25th, 2008 at 12:17 am

10. Article and remarks are proof positive that this is a sane and comforting place to read information on the latest goings on with William and Kate.

    By Positive on August 25th, 2008 at 2:19 am

11. I agree Positive- I hate those overly nasty comments on DM. I have always thought she should be doing some type of work, but I never thought that she was a bad person for the way (we see) her live her life. I’m sure if I had been given the chance to travel frequently I would have taken it and who wants to be in a job you don’t want when everyone is watching and photographing your every move. I’m just guessing that her true love is in fashion and photography, but that doesn’t align with the way the palace would want her to be seen. And we all know that when they get engaged she will have plenty of charity work to participate in. I am a BIG KM fan but I have to say it is funny to see the types of charity things she is involved in…the roller skating link was a hoot. It looks like something for the young and cool crowd, which is perfectly fine, but doubtfully going to help her gain respect. It feeds into that nightclub loving image she has gained. The dresscode said “day glo” and I would LOVE to see Kate or Will in that! The article suggested an animal charity…anyone have any ideas for that? PETA is so hardcore she could never wear her leather boots, plus the whole hunting incident. Maybe something like adoption shelters or equine therapy?

    By Dally on August 25th, 2008 at 2:28 am

12. Dally, if her true love is something with fashion and photography, then I can think of nothing better then her becoming Princess William of Wales! It is a MUST, a job requirement if you will, that she look good at all times in that position — and look how beautifully she has managed to ALWAYS look good, under EVERY circumstance over the past 5 years she has been in the spotlight. Even after the breakup last year, when the average girl might have let herself go and stayed home eating her heart out, Kate looked glamourous as ever whilst getting herself out there — “enjoying life to the max” as I believe she put it so well.

    I don’t believe Kate could or should do anything with PETA, as I’d think that might give Prince Philip a coronary. However, we have a Kittens for Convicts program through my Church, which has been instrumental in the rehabilitation of convicted felons in my town and which one can only say the best of things about. Something like that I would think would be marvelous for Kate, and it certainly has an air of gravitas about it. However, let it be known here that I have no qualms about the roller disco for charity event, as it’s for a good cause, and if everyone has a good time whilst raising money, what’s wrong with that?

    By alsgal on August 25th, 2008 at 12:45 pm

13. I think PETA would fall under the category of “activist causes” and not “charities.” I don’t think either BP or CH would approve of Kate’s involvement in an activist cause at this point.

    Doing a websearch on UK animal charities, one site lists 626. Surely Kate could find something that suits her.

    By Evelyn on August 25th, 2008 at 1:31 pm

14. I’m sure it’s annoying to both of them to read these stories in the papers, but they have an advantage: they know the truth! They know the Queen isn’t grumbling behind Kate’s back (can you even imagine such a thing?!); they have the full, loving, and proud support of the Royal Family, and knowing that must surely reduce the shrill twitterings of Katie Nicholl and her ilk to little more than background noise.

    By Dan on August 25th, 2008 at 4:19 pm

15. Dan, what you’re saying sure sounds like common sense to me! I’m with you.

    I just wish for news that accurate and without bias…too bad it’s so difficult to find these days. I’m not claiming to be unbiased myself, but I’m also not a “news” reporter Plus, I’m not mean, ha!

    By Julie on August 25th, 2008 at 5:48 pm

16. That would be “news that IS accurate”….sigh!

    By Julie on August 25th, 2008 at 5:49 pm

17. Absolutely agreed. I find some of the comments at the teenybopper sites to be so amusing “If Kate’s so clever and cunning why doesn’t she work, couldn’t she see the bad press that would result?” My Gawd, children, what part of “she’s already privately engaged and they will anounce it later on” don’t you understand?

    Yes, that’s why she might have the radiant “Look at me!” smile they are all complaining about. No it’s not smugness, it’s simply the look of a young woman who is content and at ease with her lot in life. It’s the look of a young woman who knows she’s got a lot of duty ahead of her, and who has decided to enjoy the last few remaining days of spinsterhood.

    If we look at Kate’s activities over the past six months or so, from the starting point of “Yes, they’ve committed to each other, they have agreed to marry” then all of Kate’s behaviors make sense.

    By alsgal on August 25th, 2008 at 8:17 pm

18. alsgal I have to agree with everything you say. This whole topic is getting pretty tiresome. Why is Kate always being trashed because she is Prince Williams girlfriend? First of all Kate until the engagement is formally announced is a private citizen and whether she works or her family supports her is no ones business. Second Kate and William must have some understanding of when they will get married or else she would most probably have started a career. Third Kate has conducted herself with the utmost dignity in trying circumstances especially when they broke up last year she could have sold a story or trashed him in the media instead she was silent and went about her life and William came back to her That was HIS choice. So for all the petty jealousy and nasty comments made about her, I doubt if these people met her in person they would be making them.

    By Trudie on August 25th, 2008 at 11:50 pm

19. Kate is in a catch-22 with the work situation, and has been for a long time. First she was said to be attention-seeking because we saw photos of her every single day. Now they are attacking her for not working because they don’t have their photographs that were selling newspapers.

    Once her role is more defined, I’d love to see her passion for fashion combine with a charity that provides clothes for the sick or the needy to try and boost their confidence. I don’t think it’s fair to ask someone to completely push aside their life pursuits because of love- so hopefully some happy medium can be found.

    By Greycella on August 26th, 2008 at 12:04 am

20. Greycella, I think the fashion idea is a fantastic one! I seem to remember a while back reading about a charity that collects peoples old suits and coats (business attire mostly) refurbishes it, and then invites the members of a local women’s shelter to come in and pick what suits them. Appropriate attire is critical for acing a new job interview, and this provides the opportunity for people to look their best whilst starting over. I think it would be great if Kate could do something like this, where she could turn that passion for fashion as you put it so well into something beneficial for all involved.

    By alsgal on August 26th, 2008 at 2:30 am

21. I hope Kate’s charity event isn’t overrun with paps and reporters. The tickets for the event aren’t very expensive so it could be easy for them to get in and ruin her night.

    By lizzy on August 26th, 2008 at 2:48 am

22. “You seem to think that KN has contacts both at BP and CH. I don’t believe so. She might have had once, but now her only sources are posters on royal forums and those who comment in her own paper. She hasn’t been right in anything for a long time. And she is bitter that her sources have dried up for some reason.”

    ====> Dagga, her sources if any dried up when she started listening to the cancerous posters on those awful Kate bashing royal forums, I’m guessing.

    “I don’t believe that friend who told her about the engagement either. And I don’t think there are strong anti-Kate groups at the palaces. KN doesn’t have a clue what goes on inside the palaces any longer. She has adopeted the anti-Kate groups on the internet as her new “insiders”. She is such a sorry excuse for a journalist these days.”"

    =====> Wholeheartedly agree. Those rabid anti-Kate internet stalker posters have snidely bragged about emailing less than flattering photos of Kate Middleton that they’ve stolen from Facebook and other social networking sites. It’s really disgusting, quite disturbing business that some people would stoop so low. And if I know this, I’m sure people who are acquainted with William/Kate who are secretly reading those same sites know it as well. So yeah, I’m thrilled that the sources for HACKS who peddle in this filth have dried up quickly, for the simple fear of William, Kate, or someone close to them figuring out who’s talking to the tabloid hacks.

    By Positive on August 26th, 2008 at 4:30 am

23. Last night, in my deepest sleep in months, I dreamt the whole Royal Wedding. It was a little untraditional: Kate walking alone up the Mall, lined by crowds of people, instead of walking down the aisle of a church with her father. But in my dream the date was 10 July.

    10 July 2009 is a Friday, which is unlikely. But if it’s anywhere near there (like 11 July?) I called it!

    By Dan on August 26th, 2008 at 2:10 pm

24. Dan, you’ve become the RA psychic — unless you’re proved wrong, of course.

    However, the date is feasible, and lots of psychics take a stab on likely events and timings.

    I suppose as a triple Pisces I should have the job. Trouble is, I’m occasionally wrong.

    By John on August 26th, 2008 at 2:20 pm

25. So John, what is a triple Pisces?

    July 10th? or 11th? In the Mall? Ok, now I feel like I’m playing Clue But Dan, I’ll give you credit for either day

    By Julie on August 26th, 2008 at 2:50 pm

26. Positive,
    I agree with you but I am somewhat amazed by the silliness of these people about these so-called “scandalous” pictures. I’ve seen them, and they are nothing. Big deal, so we can see a bit of Kate’s bra when she took off some of her ski clothes. Or her sister posed in a dress covered with loo paper. It was harmless fun, and a private picture at that. Last I heard, Pippa was not running for public office, so who really cares what she does?

    None of these ploys to expose Kate “for who she really is” are going to derail the wedding.

    We are no longer living in the Victorian era. Sophie Wessex is said to be one of the Queen’s favorites, and yet there are topless photos of her out there. The fact that Mrs. Sarkozy posed nude didn’t stop the Queen and the Duke from welcoming her warmly during the French State Visit.

    My reaction: big whoop. No one’s going to hold this against Kate. If that’s the worst they can come up with, then what a jewel we have in Kate indeed.

    By alsgal on August 26th, 2008 at 2:57 pm

27. I would say there is a whole generation (mine) that is grateful that the internet age was just slightly behind us so that OUR youthful indiscretions were not captured for the world! I agree, if that’s the worst that is out there for Kate she is indeed a jewel!

    As a parent, I know it’s hard to make some children understand that what is “fun” today can affect their whole life later, even seemingly “innocent fun!” Kate clearly gets this and has done a very good job of minding her business.

    By Julie on August 26th, 2008 at 3:20 pm

28. Julie, I was told by an astrologer friend that I have Sun, Moon and Descendant in Pisces — hence triple Pisces.

    I assume I should be very psychic and spiritual, but I leave others to judge that.

    By John on August 26th, 2008 at 5:19 pm

29. I’ve never given much creedence to the meaning of dreams (especially mine), but I’ve also never woke up with a date so clear in my head. It was weird.

    Frankly, I’d prefer to be wrong rather than to learn I’ve got the “gift!”

    By Dan on August 26th, 2008 at 7:11 pm

30. RAers, let’s mark that date on our calendars, just to be safe. Regarding the negative stories and negative comments about Kate and Prince William in the Daily Mail and other newspapers, just think how outraged these naysayers would be if someone they didn’t even know intruded so completely in THEIR private lives! It really makes my blood boil at their cheek and their audacity. I am quite put out!

    By Gigi on August 26th, 2008 at 8:05 pm

31. Oh, my John - I have no idea where my sun, moon or decendants are…well I’m gemini and one of my daughters is as well…is that what they mean? Ok, now I’m worried that I should know this? Well, not tooooo worried just thinking I aught to check it out. Hmmmm…

    Gigi - I agree…I’ve always struggled with my own wish to know and their right to privacy…I’m really interested in their lives but I would hate to have them uncomfortable with their lives in order for me to know. I wonder why others don’t seem to understand that they are human and should have rights as well?

    By Julie on August 26th, 2008 at 8:18 pm

32. Alsgal, the charity you describe is exactly the sort of thing I had in mind. A friend of mine hooked up with this type of organization and as silly as it might sound it really helped her find her footing as a single mom in the working world. Similar organizations work with women who have lost a breast to cancer find their confidence in wearing their clothes. Fashion doesn’t have to be frivolous!

    By Greycella on August 27th, 2008 at 12:11 am

33. Exactly, Greycella. Fashion is indeed not frivilous — I wonder how many realise it’s a multi-billion dollar industry, and a very serious business underneath the surface “fluff” if you will.

    John, Mr. Pisces Man, I do hope this astrology business is not too accurate as surfing the Internet I am finding a lot of charts for Prince William that don’t show a wedding until 2010/2011.

    By alsgal on August 27th, 2008 at 12:26 am

34. alsgal these charts really are amusing. I am personally to the point where I don’t care when they marry. Although I want to see them marry I just want it to be on their timetable not the media’s and them to just stop trashing Kate because they choose to take their time. I just want them to be happy with each other and pray William will not make the mistakes of his father and cherish and encourage his wife.

    By Trudie on August 27th, 2008 at 1:35 am

35. The Sun has an article that is similar to this current article by John. It summarizes about the KN article and the negative remarks about Kate. It talks about CH and Kate.
    Finally, it calls on William to propose if she is the one or to let her go if not. I find myself in a quandry. Part of me thinks that they need to follow their own time table. The other part of me doesn’t want to see any more negative comments written about Kate. I agree with the article that states that Kate loves William. I believe that he loves her. Maybe, they should push up their timetable. I just don’t want to see anyone hurt by the negative remarks of others.

    By kat on August 27th, 2008 at 1:41 am

36. Trudie, Kat, I’m in that quandry w/ both of you. Yes, it really should be on their timetable but on the other hand, the media like it or not (and I don’t like it one pea pickin’ bit) can influence public opinion somewhat, particularly when someone doesn’t speak out and defend themselves (as KM has, with her dignified silence.) So, she is left to suffer, is consigned to inaction whilst she waits (really, what exactly CAN she do right now?) and is left hanging for the time being, PR wise. In this sense, I feel an announcement needs to be made soon.

    By alsgal on August 27th, 2008 at 2:49 am

37. I can only hope Kate, William and the Queen are laughing at the press right now. But instinct tells me that even if everything’s fine between them, PR does matter. I really want this couple to announce their engagement and marry at their own time, and not have to be pressured into doing anything to salvage their image. But how else they can rectify such situation is beyond me. Perhaps it’ll just die down after a while. I just want to express how frustrating this must be especially for Kate. I just wish the press would stop fueling idle nothingness from idle people who have nothing else to do except amuse themselves by finding ways to criticize others.

    By frands on August 27th, 2008 at 4:07 am

38. I fear this will not stop anytime soon though. These sort of stories are about the only ones they can currently write about Kate because one doesn’t need daily pictures of her to print this. Actually the less Kate is seen the easier it becomes to sell “Waity Katie” stories. I hate how they always make it sound like all she does is shop and party when everyone should know that she was hardly seen in London at all and certainly is not out shopping let alone partying a lot. It’s pretty much like Harry’s party boy image. I fear it will take quite some time to get ridd off it once more because even if there’s just a single picture of her out partying within a month, she’ll be called a party girl and the tirade about her not doing anything but party and shop will start all over again.
    I wouldn’t be so sure that this will magically die down once she engaged. The people who bash her on a daily basis do not do so because she’s not working, they do so because for whatever reason they cannot stand her. So an engagement ring will just change the tune of criticism not the fact that it is there. Undoubtedly every single public appearance will be torn apart from the hair, to the make-up, the cloths, her behaviour etc. and nothing will be good enough. And the press will not stop these stories either because they apparently sell regardless of how unreasonable and far fetched they are.
    While I can understand that we all wish this to stop, William would make himself subject to blackmail by the press if he got engaged in an attempt to protect her from these attacks. I fear they’d have to “sit this out” and I am also sure Kate isn’t worried by these stories because she knows what is going on and that the allegations are wrong.

    By Isana on August 27th, 2008 at 5:13 am

39. Kat, you’re right, Jane Moore’s piece in The Sun seems to have taken its lead from our article. And quite right too. It’s time a decent and admired journalist took up the cudgels for Kate.

    When the engagement is announced, most will suddenly change their tune and claim to have been Kate supporters all along.

    I believe there’s only one outlet that can claim that distinction — and we’re too modest to name it.

    But well done Jane Moore. You have risen up the pantheon of Royal Anecdotes’s favourite scribblers.

    By John on August 27th, 2008 at 9:04 am

40. I forgot to add the link to that last comment. I’ve now added it.

    By John on August 27th, 2008 at 9:07 am

41. Thank you for that link, John, as I would never have seen the article otherwise. I do not read any of the red-tops. How ironic that one of their writers got it right when the Daily Mail has gotten it so totally wrong. This proves the point that one ought not to categorize people, even writers, because of the organizations that employ them.

    Let us look on the bright side. I am grateful that none of us decided to hold his/her breath last year when some of us (myself included) were so certain that the engagement was imminent that I was planning tea menus and gathering roses for the rose bowl! We would all be six feet under in that eventuality! Let us all take a deep breath, contemplate the beauty and the ideally apropos qualities of a Christmastide engagement leading to a July wedding (hat tip to Dan) and begin to mentally coordinate our accessories. May I also add that when we hold our Royal Anecdotes Gala Royal Engagement Tea, I fear that Katie Nichols will not–I repeat, will NOT–be issued an invitation unless our dear John views her with the Christian charity which enobles his nature and overrules me, which is his right to do. I, as you observe, am still in a snit!

    By Gigi on August 27th, 2008 at 4:43 pm

42. I understand this site is not a democracy, however I vote with you Gigi! Nay on including KN! But of course, John has the final say

    So, I’m trying to remember if I have an appropriate hat for a tea such as this…hmmmm……

    By Julie on August 27th, 2008 at 5:08 pm

43. I’m changing the subject, but…

    Recently we chatted about Prince and Princess Michael and their rent scandal in Kensington Palace, into which the Queen stepped and ponied up.

    Do all the Family members pay rent on their apartments in various palaces? Does the Queen actually pay rent on Buckingham Palace? What about the Yorks (Royal Lodge), the Wessexes (Bagshot Park), the Kents (Kenny also), the Gloucesters (Kenny again), etc.? I thought they were Royal Residences (as the Royal website calls them), Crown properties intended for the Royal Family. Why should Michael & Michael have to pay market rent to live in a Royal Residence?

    By Dan on August 27th, 2008 at 8:06 pm

44. Just discovered an English astrolger named Marjorie Orr who is predicting a May, 2011 wedding for Prince William. Let’s hope she is wrong, as that’s an awfully long time for some of us to wait.

    By alsgal on August 28th, 2008 at 1:00 am

45. That is a long time! Especially for Kate!

    By Julie on August 28th, 2008 at 1:39 pm

46. If an engagement is truly two years off, I worry about the strength of the relationship. There is a legitimate argument for being cautious and deliberate—they want to be sure marriage is the right thing for them—but taking it SO slow would indicate to me that one or the other of them is not sure, or perhaps both of them have doubts.

    I don’t see how any relationship could withstand the public scrutiny they are already enduring were it to continue another two years. An heir to the throne must know his heart and be able to commit. The last thing Britain needs is a marriage-averse heir like Albert of Monaco, soiled by a who’s who of supermodels, film stars, air hostesses and their assorted illegitimate issue.

    By Dan on August 28th, 2008 at 4:36 pm

47. Dan, this is an astrologer reading the runes. A Christmas engagement would be a perfect fit for William’s career path for next year. I tend to believe that.

    By John on August 28th, 2008 at 4:40 pm

48. If I may continue…

    A worse scenario is that they stay together by inertia: neither able to commit to the other, but neither having the courage or ambition to see complacency as a vice and move on. If they are simply dithering, a senior member of the Family will need to step in and, as Prince Philip used to say, “pull the thumb out.”

    By Dan on August 28th, 2008 at 4:41 pm

49. Dan to answer your question regarding rents I have read that the residents previously paid common charges, utilities etc in exchange for their royal duties. Prince Michael and his wife do not carryout official duties and from what I gather this charging of rent is because MP’s think it should not be borne by the taxpayer and rent should be paid at fair market value. Royal Lodge is part of Sandringham and a Private estate it was left to Andrew from His grandmother the QM. As for Bageshot Park the Wessexes lease this from the Queen as it is part of the Crown estates and they have a lease. I hope this answers your questions.

    By Trudie on August 28th, 2008 at 4:50 pm

50. Yes, my comments do not reflect what I believe to be happening. I feel certain an announcement is coming.

    But if 2011 IS the timeframe in William and/or Kate’s mind, then what I’ve said above may be amiss.

    Mind you, I don’t often take the musings of astrologers as an acceptable premise!

    By Dan on August 28th, 2008 at 4:53 pm

51. Back to my other subject…

    The Queen gave Anne and Andrew residences of their own as wedding gifts. (Gatcombe for Anne, the notorious and now sundered Sunninghill for Andrew). Is it strange that she didn’t do the same for Edward and Sophie, both of whom HM is very fond? It seems odd she would expect them to lease from the Crown when her other children own the homes that she gave them.

    Then again, the example of Sunninghill perhaps inspired her toward a less problematic wedding gift for the Wessexes.

    By Dan on August 28th, 2008 at 4:59 pm

52. Although I certainly don’t have an inside track (except for CPB’s nephew, whom I see at parties occasionally), K & W seem to know what they’re doing and where they’re going….

    By Amity on August 28th, 2008 at 5:03 pm

53. Amity, is Camilla’s nephew at Harvard?

    By John on August 28th, 2008 at 5:07 pm

54. Dan, England’s best regarded astrologer, Jonathan Cainer, predicted that Hillary would win the Presidency. At about the same time I forecast she wouldn’t.

    He also thought the financial downturn would be over by the summer, while I predicted it would go on for much longer.

    Sometimes journalists have the edge over astrologers.

    By John on August 28th, 2008 at 5:10 pm

55. Maybe the astrologer is mis-reading the runes, and the May 2011 date will be the birth of W&K’s first child. That also will be a significant occasion!

    By Evelyn on August 28th, 2008 at 5:10 pm

56. Evelyn, that sounds so right.

    By John on August 28th, 2008 at 5:13 pm

57. Oh, I DO like the sound of that!

    So, John, who are you predicting now for US Prez?

    By Julie on August 28th, 2008 at 5:29 pm

58. Julie, I predicted John McCain will win narrowly back in February before even he or Obama were nominated by their parties.

    I stand by that prediction.

    By John on August 28th, 2008 at 5:32 pm

59. Interesting…thank you for sharing your prediction. And that would make my husband very happy

    By Julie on August 28th, 2008 at 5:48 pm

60. Nope, CPB’s nephew is married and just bought a place in NYC. He’s a close friend of a close friend, so we see him occasionally. I have never ever talked to him about K&W, though. (My own private interest is in what ultimately happens to KM, as I feel she has a compelling biography - I would be too embarrassed to admit any interest in the British Royal Family in public, though!)

    By Amity on August 28th, 2008 at 6:02 pm

61. I wonder how many of the British feel the same way as Amity—genuinely interested in their Royal Family but embarrassed to admit it publicly.

    We have an opposite thing happening in the US: people who would NEVER vote for a black man for president but say publicly that they might, too ashamed to admit to being a racist.

    By Dan on August 28th, 2008 at 6:23 pm

62. Dan. in these politically correct times people get embarrassed about lots of things. If we were all more honest, we’d have fewer problems, I’m sure.

    Obama is a potential star, but he needs to get more experience, and the average American needs to know he’s in tune with them. That will take a little time, I’m guessing.

    By John on August 28th, 2008 at 6:55 pm

63. It’s a pity no one applied the same standard to the inexperienced George Bush (a failed businessman and a one-term governor of Texas, the main qualification for which is to be able to sign death penalty orders). All anyone cared about was that he was the kind of guy they would like to have a beer with. Never mind he’s an alcoholic.

    We’ll see what happens in November. Maybe an engagement announcement will push the election results off the front page!

    By Dan on August 28th, 2008 at 7:12 pm

64. Politically, I don’t care if a person is green if they share the same beliefs as me on certain subjects. Personally, I can only think that you are cutting off your nose to spite your face if you only choose your friends from your same race, religion etc. In the world we live in diversity is REAL. Get over it!

    But my sister’s in-laws are still living with that group that you mention. Although they show no embarassment in their predjudice. It’s very sad really. In their case it’s a closed mind and an open mouth. Which at least then you know how they feel and that is good informtaion to have. Sorry…end of rant!

    By Julie on August 28th, 2008 at 8:15 pm

65. Agreed, Julie. I have relatives and acquaintances who will never be enlightened on matters of race. But at least they aren’t faking it.

    I also think “experience” can be a mixed bag. Decades of experience won’t prevent bad decisions or bad policies. And it’s also possible to have so much experience, particularly in Washington, that it will prevent a candidate from breaking the status quo, having fresh ideas, or getting anything accomplished.

    What I find intriguing about John McCain is that he touts his military experience as a qualification. Yet he admits that he was a lousy student at the Naval Academy (his Admiral father got him into the Academy AND assured his graduation); then he was a lousy pilot, more than once almost getting himself and others killed; then he was shot down and imprisoned in Viet Nam, where his Admiral father (Naval Commander of the Pacific theater at the time) once again assured his preferential treatment. John Jr. wasn’t known as the Crown Prince for nothing.

    I don’t consider McCain a war hero. He was a war victim, mostly due to his own poor abilities, and I believe his experiences, then and since, would make him a dreadful Commander-in-Chief.

    Hmm. Maybe I ought to write my own blog somewhere else, and reserve this space for Royal thoughts. Sorry, especially to all you honorable Republicans!

    By Dan on August 28th, 2008 at 8:52 pm

66. John,

    America have been through a lot over the past eight years with Bush as our President and I have to say that America’s soul is tierd and we need a major change. It’s sad to see kids not able to go to college because the tuition is too high, our veterans not getting the proper treatment, people losing their homes and gas prices on the rise. To elect John McCain to the Presidency would just give us four more years of Bush’s eight years and we can’t take that. Obama represent’s a new day and that major change we so desperately need. Let’s face it, we are suffering.

    Now I’m with you guys on it looks like we will have a winter of spring engagement. I still look to this site for news.

    By Claudius on August 28th, 2008 at 9:06 pm

67. Yes I don’t this is a site for our presidential views, I’m sorry too. But I hear Kate and Chelsy is invited to Charles’s birthday dinner and that is very exciting news.

    By Claudius on August 28th, 2008 at 9:10 pm

68. Well… we could turn this political talk into a royal conversation. What would it be like to the Prince & Princess William to attend a state dinner in an Obama White House? A McCain White House? I don’t expect the Queen would come to our country again anytime soon. Might Prince Charles and the Duchess of Cornwall come? I assume royalty would not be coming for a presidential inauguration.

    By Evelyn on August 28th, 2008 at 9:23 pm

69. Claudius, Dan, Julie, and others: I don’t necessarily want McCain to win, just that I think he will win. That’s a very different matter.

    I don’t happen to admire the Cheney view of the world, so don’t want it to continue. But McCain is not Cheney, and Obama needs to break away from what we have had these last 11 years under the hopeless Blair and Brown administrations in Britain.

    But let’s leave politics to the voters.

    By John on August 28th, 2008 at 9:31 pm

70. Claudius, you give me a chance to explain one of my points.

    We toss around the term “war hero” a lot in my country, but we usually use it in reference to dead troops, or people like McCain with the money and connections to get back on their feet after they come home from the front. But what about all the men and women of modest means who entered the military because it was their only job opportunity, served honorably, then finished their multiple tours of duty and returned to find no health care, no jobs, no educational opportunity, no child care, and on and on. And that’s for the soldiers who return unharmed! God forbid they return gravely wounded, because they are on their own in the USA.

    Some people prefer their “war heroes” dead the way they prefer their children unborn. You don’t have to house them, feed them, clothe them, educate them, employ them, or provide health care, elder care, or hospice care for them. Unborn children and dead “war heroes” don’t cost a penny. You can proclaim them God’s Most Sacred Creations and still keep all your money to yourself.

    By Dan on August 28th, 2008 at 9:32 pm

71. I think our country (USA) needs a bigger change than we would get with John McCain. I, for one, will vote for Obama.

    By Evelyn on August 28th, 2008 at 9:40 pm

72. John, I agree with you. Having seen what the Republicans did to John Kerry (all of which has been either dismissed as lies, or has since been duplicated by flip-flopping McCain!) I am convinced that Obama will be treated the same way.

    It’s only a matter of time before we start hearing his middle name, “Hussein,” used regularly in campaign attack ads. If that doesn’t work, we’ll start hearing rumors about Obama’s past relationships with white women. In fact, I predict those rumors will be this election year’s “October Surprise.” Some political operatives will stop at nothing to stop him.

    This campaign is going to be the ugliest ever, and McCain will probably win it.

    By Dan on August 28th, 2008 at 9:44 pm

73. I need to weigh in on this discussion. I was for Hillary Clinton. Before anyone says anything, she truly tried to ready herself for the presidency. She had the experience and the knowledge. To me I don’t think that the best candidate won. The reason why I don’t want Obama is the reason why I did not want Bush. Neither candidate had the experience outside of state political matters. Obama might have been a great candidiate had he stayed in the senate or become vice president and learned all about government and how it applies to the world. I would have voted for him. I think that Hillary has the intelligence needed to become comander in cheif. With Obama as the vice president he would have learned from her. I do reject the statements that if you don’t vote for him you are racist or you are bitter. I want someone who is well prepared for the job. Much as William is preparing for his role as king.

    By kat on August 28th, 2008 at 9:58 pm

74. I usually attracted to older men but for the WH, I prefer a younger president.

    By Mikado-watcher on August 28th, 2008 at 9:59 pm

75. kat, as Bill Clinton pointed out last night at the DNC, he was labelled as too young and inexperienced too when he was nominated for the presidency. I used to dislike Obama as well for the same reasons (and although I am an independent I supported Hillary during the primary, and my brother supported McCain in his past runs for the presidency), but now we are all behind Obama.

    By Amity on August 28th, 2008 at 10:20 pm

76. I would prefer to vote for a royal family over here, to be honest. I wouldn’t be embarrassed to embrace my curiosity of the Royal Family. However, I am American, and we gawk at everyone we see who may have had even the slightest bit of fame.

    I predict a McCain win. I’m not a fan of either candidates, for political reasons, but hope someone turns this ship around and get it tip top shape again.

    I find it kind of humorous that McCain’s wife’s half sister will be voting for Obama.

    By Meg on August 29th, 2008 at 12:36 am

77. One of the best presidents the USA had was Harry S. Truman and he came without a lot of experience. Don’t underestimate a man because he isn’t that experienced. I don’t think that McCain has that much experience. He just has had the same experience many times. Time for a change. And yes, white’s are no longer the majority in our country. It has become a rainbow. Enjoy the variety and tap the smartest for national service.

    By Grandma828 on August 29th, 2008 at 12:38 am

78. In fact, Bill Clinton was 46 when elected president. Obama is 47. I was not a fan of Clinton’s personal life, but appreciated many of the strides our country (and the world) made under his leadership. I believe Obama will listen to the best advisors, inspire the country to turn things around, and regain US respect within the world community.

    By Evelyn on August 29th, 2008 at 12:52 am

79. I don’t think it’s surprising at all that Cindy McCain’s half-sister embraces Obama - Mrs. McCain always treated her half-sister very poorly and didn’t even acknowledge her existence at their father’s funeral. Furthermore, her half-sister was left $10,000 vs Cindy McCain’s $100,000,000+ inheritance so I’m sure their life circumstances are very different also. Frankly, Cindy McCain doesn’t strike me as particularly warm-hearted or embracing either, which is also not surprising given how her father always gave her everything she wanted. I am just not impressed by her life story.

    By Amity on August 29th, 2008 at 1:15 am

80. Btw, I have nothing against someone always getting everything they want - I know lots of people who have never worked in their lives and have everything they want and are absolutely amazing human beings. What I think is disappointing about Cindy McCain is she seems to lack a certain generosity of spirit. It’s not a great quality for a politician’s wife.

    By Amity on August 29th, 2008 at 1:20 am

81. Actually I agree with Kat. I very much supported Hillary and still do. As a New Yorker and a near neighbor I volunteered to work on her campaign. I am so disappointed she lost. As a Democrat I now support Obama but I wish he really had a bit more experience. As for Dans comments that his past relationships with White women may be an October surprise it won’t be Obama is bi-racial his mother being white. Who cares? I just hope he is well equipped Jan 20 when he is sworn in. Sorry John I just know he will win. As for Cindy McCain I agree with everyone that woman just leaves me cold.

    By Trudie on August 29th, 2008 at 3:04 am

82. John, you should not have mentioned the Presidential race with so many Americans on the board. Everyone here is passionate about it.

    I think Kate-Hate sells newspapers, that’s why we see these articles. Regarding an engagement - well, we are getting close to showtime, aren’t we?

    I always expected a Feb 2009 announcement and a summer wedding. However, it does look like the Kate-Hate is gaining strength in anticipation of the announcement.

    It does seem like the girl has her enemies, doesn’t it.

    By Alicia on August 29th, 2008 at 5:24 am

83. Kate only has enemies because most young women and the father’s and mother’s of aristos are jealous of her being Williams GF. These people really need to grow up.

    By Trudie on August 29th, 2008 at 10:57 am

84. Amity, both Bush and Clinton were not ready for the job when they got in. Clinton made a complete mess of his first term and had to reverse most of it in his second, including dumping his wife’s over-ambitious healthcare plan.

    With trouble brewing in the Caucusus, and over Iran, the last thing any of us needs right now is another greenhorn President. That’s why I think McCain will win it. In his last TV debate with Obama, he was crisp and precise, while Obama waffled. A lot of people over here thought McCain won hands down.

    But Obama can stand again. McCain could be a one-term President because of his age — 72 yesterday. Obama could be fighting Hillary again in 2012, which will probably be a better spectacle than the London Olympics.

    By John on August 29th, 2008 at 11:30 am

85. Alicia, the election gets almost as much coverage over here as in America. The BBC News Channel shows just about everything.

    It’s hard not to discuss it. It’s like the elephant in the broom cupboard.

    By John on August 29th, 2008 at 11:33 am

86. Has anyone a clue as to where William and Kate are? Did they ever get to Balmoral, Birkhall ? Just curious.

    By kat on August 29th, 2008 at 11:37 am

87. Kat, I imagine they’ve spent some time at Balmoral, but certainly out of the limelight. William starts work again on Monday, I believe, as do I. We have something in common.

    It will be interesting to see what the Sunday papers have to reveal this week.

    By John on August 29th, 2008 at 11:48 am

88. John, you mistake me for an Obama die-hard. I am not a political junkie, and I don’t contribute to any political campaigns, wave signs, wear buttons, etc. I just think that Obama makes a more compelling case than McCain, who for all the good that he’s done in the past seems to have made a Faustian bargain with Karl Rove and his operatives in order to win the US Presidency.

    By Amity on August 29th, 2008 at 1:35 pm

89. If Obama wins the White House, Prince Charles (and presumably Camilla) will come calling. The Queen will invite them to Buckingham Palace, but probably not travel to Washington.

    It will be interesting to see what the new Prince and Princess of Wales-in-waiting (oh no, Kate waits again!!) will do on the world stage.

    By Dan on August 29th, 2008 at 2:25 pm

90. Random question about attire to a royal wedding. (Now this maybe a more British tradition which I’m unaware of). But most pictures of royal weddings, the guys seems to wear a tux with a tail(no idea if its called that). But at Peter and Lady Windsor’s wedding, all the men seem to have the same type of tux. Is that a royal tradition, look etc?

    By American Cousin on August 29th, 2008 at 2:33 pm

91. So McCain picks a woman, Sarah Palin, to run with him. She’s 44, younger than Obama. She’s in her first term as governor of Alaska, before which she was mayor of a small town.

    No one in the US knows much about her, except that she is Republican and anti-abortion.

    Things just got interestinger.

    John, you’d better post a Royal scoop, or the US election is going to take over your site! I’ll try to restrain myself from now on.

    By Dan on August 29th, 2008 at 3:10 pm

92. Dan, I’m across the Sarah Palin story — been watching it develop on the wires and websites. Very shrewd as it will mop up a lot of Hillary disaffectors from the Democrats, whereas Colin Powell would have nullified McCain’s anti-black vote — which he won’t mention but is clearly part of the strategy.

    As for a Royal scoop, The Sun is reporting that Harry is insisiting he wants to go back to Afghanistan. He won’t, of course, the Army has already ruled that out.

    I’m guessing this is a prelude to Harry resigning his Army Commisssion and following William out of the services. He’s probably had enough of hanging around Windsor Barracks.

    He’s promised Prince Philip that he won’t be as dissolute as he has been in the future and will settle to a steady programme of good works.

    The pieces of the jigsaw are falling into place.

    By John on August 29th, 2008 at 3:27 pm

93. I’m concerned that if he leaves the Army, the structure of which has done him enormous good, he’ll leave Britain as well, seeing no other place for him there.

    Or worse, he’ll fall into the rudderless pattern of other spares before him, Andrew, Margaret, and Michael of Kent, known more for their missteps in private than for their public accomplishments.

    By Dan on August 29th, 2008 at 4:15 pm

94. I do hope that if he leaves the service, he finds a calling that will give him a sense of purpose. That really is critical to a persons happiness. But then I wish that for everyone

    By Julie on August 29th, 2008 at 6:04 pm

95. At one point, it was reported that Prince William would like to join the UK rescue team, but now it doesn’t seem like he’ll have time for that. Might that be where Prince Harry might serve? I could see that as a worthy way to serve for the next 5-10 years, off and on as his royal and charity schedule permits.

    By Evelyn on August 29th, 2008 at 10:34 pm

96. The Telegraph is reporting that Lady Gabriella Windsor has taken her journalism career to Spain, where she’s now working for the Spanish version of Hello!, Hola! They’ve put her first story on the cover.

    By Evelyn on August 29th, 2008 at 10:57 pm

97. It’s been reported that Madam Tussaud’s wax museum has started working on a wax figure of Kate Middleton, so it will be ready for display the moment that Prince William & Kate announce their engagement.

    By Evelyn on August 30th, 2008 at 4:35 pm

98. Thanks for the info, Evelyn. The outer Royal Family are certainly branching out.

    As for Harry, I don’t think he can fly a plane, so it’s unlikely he’ll be drafted into the rescue services. We shall see.

    By John on August 30th, 2008 at 5:46 pm

99. From the little that I read, it also includes mountain rescues. That sounds like something Harry could learn. His experience leading army personnel could be helpful.

    By Evelyn on August 30th, 2008 at 6:00 pm

100. Daily Mail’s latest has them hitting on the Middletons again with unflattering pictures of James. And **gulp** they even mentioned another forum frequented by Kate haters and quoted a few people’s nasty remarks.

     THIS HAS GONE TOO FAR. I am beyond upset on their insistence to use such sources. Time to write the DM and express your thoughts!

     By frands on August 31st, 2008 at 12:07 am

101. No need for that Frands, as the Middleton’s lawyers are perhaps already considering taking action against those involved?

     The Michael Keith-Smith case from 2006 sets an interesting precedent regarding libel in UK Internet chat rooms. I believe the woman in the chatroom who was doing the name calling was fined 10,000. pounds or so, I’ll have to take a look.

     Expressing an opinion is one thing, but deliberately and with malice setting out to destroy another person’s reputation is quite another thing entirely.

     By alsgal on August 31st, 2008 at 12:56 am

102. It is one thing to not like the person that is dating William. It is one thing to voice opinions about that person. However when the DM sets out with the help of people on that forum’s pictures and words to hurt another person to sell papers, it is morally criminal in my opinion. I went to the site mentioned and most everyone was laughing and congratulating themselves. I am speechless. How juvenile can people be? Do they really think that William would have anything to do with such hateful people? I feel sorry for the people on that site who had nothing to do with any of this. I hope that the Royal Family and William will throw their whole supporrt behind Kate and her family. It is only by doing this that the DM will lose in the end. The pictures show James being silly. Who has not done things that they were not proud of after drinking? I hope that the RF does not hold this against Kate. If they do, then the people who daily trash Kate will have won.

     By kat on August 31st, 2008 at 1:11 am

103. Kat, there is no such thing as free speech when it comes to libel laws.
     I’m sure this won’t hurt Kate in the slightest, as PW is known for his loyalty, and also that he can be a bit contrarian when the occasion calls for it. If anything, this will probably draw him closer to Kate, as he saw the harm that was done to his mother by some of the more vicious members of the media.
     (Although I am sure it’s been hurtful to the Middelton’s that they now have learned, the hard way, that many so-called “friends” cannot be trusted.)

     So, my prediction holds, a Wedding in summer of 2009, unless that blasted astrologer is correct, in which case May 2011.

     By alsgal on August 31st, 2008 at 1:47 am

104. Alsgal, thanks for the calming words. I just do not understand people who can’t accept the fact that William might just love Kate and visa versa. Instead of thinking about two people who support each other and care about each other, it is always that Kate has an agenda. To think about what they have is a joyful.
     To realize that other people and the DM choose not to see this is sad. The DM wants to sell papers. What are the others’ excuse?
     On a lighter note, I hope that the astrologer’s calculations are not wrong just off let’s say about 2 years.

     By kat on August 31st, 2008 at 2:04 am

105. On a positive note the reported reaction of the Middleton family when presented with the pictures says it all. These sorts of “reports” will eventually backfire on the DM.
     I cannot imagine that people will not start feeling sorry for Kate and her family when they are constantly dragged through the mudd by this rag. I wouldn’t send them any comments - that just gives them what they want namely attention - ignore them that’s the worse “punishment” a paper can get. I am sure most Brits very well realise that from all the British tabloids the DM is the least to have any inside information on anyone close to Royalty. They even have to admit in their articles that their sources are online forums - how embarrassing.

     By Isana on August 31st, 2008 at 8:25 am

106. I’m still pissed at the DM for yet another irresponsible round of Middleton bullying. But (if true) it’s admirable how Pippa and Carole handled the reporter who knocked on their door and offered to show them the pictures. Shows a lot of maturity and class. Have to give them credit how they’re handling this circus.

     On another note, the Daily Express has an article claiming Kate’s “friends” said the Queen accepts Kate’s work life… and that she in fact works for her parents full-time. Can’t say it’s that reliable, but it sure is good to have reports supporting the other side of the old jobless claims.

     By frands on August 31st, 2008 at 9:02 am

107. The article by Nathan Kay in the MoS is both naive and empty since it quotes a number of frankly half-crazed people who repeat themselves over and over on message boards. If I were a psychiatrist I would diagnose early-onset Alzheimer’s disease for these people.

     Varya (quoted) has been banned at Royal Anecdotes on a number of occasions under different names — I can tell from the message header who’s who and who’s double-posting. Varya used to write along the lines of, “No RING, no ENGAGEMENT, no JOB. This girl is a waste of space.”

     The Mail quotes her thus: “She doesn’t work, hasn’t worked, shows no incentive to actually do anything meaningful and productive. In doing this, it seems she thinks that she is above everyone else, including past princesses.”

     Apart from being wrong, it’s obsessive and indicates an unbalanced mind. Perhaps Nathan is unaware that many of these posters have been repeating themselves for years and should be treated as stalkers on the people they hate so much.

     As for the pictures of James being viewed 10,000 times in three months, so what? RA can get up to 30,000 unique visitors in a single day. By contrast, one hundred per day is very small beer. Why is the Mail making a whole page splash out of this trivial non-story?

     By John on August 31st, 2008 at 11:11 am

108. The other Royal piece headed: “Queen tells Charles: Get William a charity job,” is yet another arresting headline looking for a story.

     It’s well known that the Way Ahead Group, which includes the Queen and Prince William, has been planning William’s career path after his military service is over in January.

     They have been toying with the idea of William having his own version of Charles’s super-successful Prince’s Trust, or an offshoot of it until he eventually takes it over on becoming Prince of Wales — by far the best solution, RA thinks.

     William is already the patron of eight charities on top of his heavy military commitments.

     Now look at that headline again: “Queen tells Charles: Get William a charity job.” It doesn’t make sense, does it? It’s about on a par with the “Queen tells Kate: Get a charity job,” they gave us last week.

     Come on Katie, get yourself a better headline writer.

     By John on August 31st, 2008 at 11:23 am

109. John, I wouldn’t say those posters have Alzheimer’s. More likely borderline personality disorder. Such people often thrive on conflict.

     By Evelyn on August 31st, 2008 at 12:22 pm

110. Evelyn, it was meant as a joke.

     By John on August 31st, 2008 at 12:30 pm

111. It’s strange the Mail doesn’t quote commenters here at RA.

     I suppose there’s no traction in supportive commentary, although the difference in traffic to both sites shows that there is a big audience for measured reporting of the Kate Middleton saga.

     At least Jane Moore in The Sun followed our line last week.

     By John on August 31st, 2008 at 12:34 pm

112. Yes, I realize that it was a joke, John. But my reply was serious. People with borderline personality disorder can be scary. They often pass as “normal,” but can be very difficult.

     By Evelyn on August 31st, 2008 at 12:56 pm

113. Ouch on the pictures. The first thing that came to my mind it that all along there have never been any inappropriate pics of Kate, which is most important. Secondly, PW and PH have had a few embarrassing photos of themselves so this isn’t too shocking…and he isn’t even a royal.

     By dally on August 31st, 2008 at 1:14 pm

114. The Sunday Express reports that William and Harry want to focus on few charities to get more deepl yinvolved with each single one.
     http://tinyurl.com/6qtch4

     By Isana on August 31st, 2008 at 1:16 pm

115. John, what is Daily Mail trying to accomplish by posting pictures of Kate’s brother and quoting that nasty internet site? Do you think it’s true that the Daily Mail is PO’d because their sources royal have dried up?

     By Positive on August 31st, 2008 at 1:19 pm

116. Positive, the Mail on Sunday is a different newspaper from the Daily Mail. It has a different editorial team and different writers.

     I don’t think their Royal sources have dried up, just that some are better than others, and occasionally the lesser ones have a more exciting tale to tell. Also, Sunday is a very competitive day for paper sales, so headline writers crank the story up and often pitch it way over the top.

     By John on August 31st, 2008 at 1:33 pm

117. Oh ok thanks for explaining. Well, I feel with great satisfaction today that a few people are stewing in their own juices over this little Daily Mail article.

     By Positive on August 31st, 2008 at 1:57 pm

118. If we look carefully at the photographs of PW/KM on their island vacation we can clearly see most members of the Middleton family having a great time along with them. This is how PW feels about his likely future inlaws. I left a comment on the article at the DM along this line…we’ll see if they print it.

     By Claudia on August 31st, 2008 at 2:41 pm

119. Let’s hope Gigi and others will be safe from Hurricane Gustav. One report said it may make landfall over Southern Texas.

     Looks like New Orleans is in for it too — again. At what point will people abandon the city for good?

     By John on August 31st, 2008 at 2:42 pm

120. My parents have two homes in NOLA (both of which were untouched during Katrina) and I’ve wondered the same thing!

     By Amity on August 31st, 2008 at 5:18 pm

121. John, have you been to New Orleans?

     By lionhound on August 31st, 2008 at 7:40 pm

122. frands,

     I saw that Camilla Tominey article in the Express too. But one thing that really struck me was the part about how Kate had put off pursuing a career because IF she married William she would have to quit. Huh? Kate should already know by know if marriage to Prince William is in the cards for her. And if it isn’t 1.) she shouldn’t have gotten back together with him in the first place 2.) William should not have had her at such high profile events like the Garter or the Phillips wedding 3.) Kate shouldn’t be arranging her life to suit him. I don’t know how credible this particular writer or newspaper is but this is the second time I have read that William doesn’t intend to marry Kate next year- the first was the News of the World. And the same weak excuse was given both times- he’ll be busy. Far be it for me to pass judgment on either William or Kate because I don’t know them personally, but this doesn’t strike me as a very smart move on their part, especially Kate. She’ll be 27 in January 2009! She has put her life on hold since graduating St Andrews. Does William really expect her to do it for a few more years? And would Kate really allow herself to be strung along until he’s good and ready to propose to her?

     By lizzy on August 31st, 2008 at 8:55 pm

123. I’m in the Houston area and I am about to go buy some nice rain boots to wear around school this week. We will be getting a lot of rain I think. I’m hoping no damage from winds.

     By dally on September 1st, 2008 at 12:35 am

124. Best of luck to anyone who is affected by Gustav. I hope that you stay safe. I will be thinking about everyone in the area. I don’t know how to post little urls however there is an interesting story in the Sun. Evidentaly Pippa’s camera was stolen. With the help of The Sun, it was ws recovered.There was a arrest made for someone trying to to sell the pictures on the camera. A second person was be sought in connection with the scheme. In a related unrelated matter, a 24 year old was introuble. Congrats to the Sun for having the good judgement to call the police when first contacted.

     By kat on September 1st, 2008 at 1:51 am

125. I second that, Kat, regarding all who might be affected by Gustav.

     Hmmmm … a twenty four year old female, I wonder what she did? I wonder if she was an ex-friend of Pippa’s or something, they are about the same age?

     By alsgal on September 1st, 2008 at 2:13 am

126. The Sun’s article says that the 24-year old woman was arrested in a matter unrelated to Pippa’s camera.

     Yes, I, too, am glad the Sun did the right thing. Interesting, though, that they felt it was okay to describe several of the photos on the stolen camera. Of course, what they describe sounds fine by me– it supports RA’s view, that Prince William & Kate have a fun and loving relationship, supported by her family. It sounds like it was a good vacation.

     By Evelyn on September 1st, 2008 at 3:03 am

127. Looks like a lot of people will be without a homa in Houma, where Gustav will hit tomorrow.

     John, they’ll never abandon New Orleans because at heart all Cajuns are crazy. Why else would they have ever left Canada all those years ago?

     By alsgal on September 1st, 2008 at 3:54 am

128. The camera/photos story is an indication of just how far security needs to extend from Kate herself.

     Pippa and James really need to be aware that what might seem innocent family matters are now valuable public property if they get into the wrong hands. The possibilities of damage to Kate, William and the Royal Family are obvious.

     On Gustav, let’s just hope the levees aren’t breached again this time, even though it remains a bigger storm than Katrina.

     I bet William is glad he’s still not aboard HMS Iron Duke in the Caribbean — and that he and Kate are back from Mustique.

     By John on September 1st, 2008 at 1:05 pm

129. Gustav has just been downgraded to a category 2 hurricane. It’s coming ashore west of New Orleans. Expectations are for less damage than Katrina, according to NPR.

     By Evelyn on September 1st, 2008 at 1:18 pm

130. That is good news, Evelyn. Those poor wretches who have stayed behind in New Orleans should be okay now, should they?

     By John on September 1st, 2008 at 1:21 pm

131. John, it will be awhile before we know for sure how things will turn out in New Orleans. Things are looking up at this moment. Waves are overtopping some of the levees, due to storm surge. It will be another 8-18 hours (my guess) before we know if the levees will hold.

     Some areas are without power. I’ve heard a report on NPR that some homes in Louisiana and Mississippi have experienced some flooding. While Gustav is a big storm, it doesn’t seem to be packing the same punch as Katrina.

     By Evelyn on September 1st, 2008 at 7:00 pm

132. Hello magazine, the Daily Mail and the Sunday Express all report that Kate is working for her parents full time. According to the Daily Mail she compiles and edits catalogues for Party Pieces. She is also on the new Hello cover.

     By Isana on September 2nd, 2008 at 10:02 am

133. Soooo, just as we thought. I hate to say to the naysayers “We told you so” but

     By alsgal on September 2nd, 2008 at 2:40 pm

134. That “tux with a tail” is not a tuxedo at all. It’s a morning coat, the most formal daytime men’s clothing still in use. (The tuxedo is evening-wear, not worn before 6:00 or sundown.) The morning coat is black or grey, worn with grey striped trousers, and a grey, cream, or buff vest (”waistcoat” in the U.K.). Traditionally, a wing collar and ascot were worn, but the turndown collar and necktie are now standard.

     By Jim Katz on November 2nd, 2008 at 3:14 am

135. HOlla
     Whatsup guys?
     I have a question thats been on my mind for a long time.. What is acai berry?
     I keep seeing commercials on tv and advertisements on the internet so im finally starting to get interested.
     I guess its some fruit that is extremly healthy for you and your skin?
     I wouldnt mind losing a couple pounds so i kind of want to buy acai berry .. so if any
     of you know any reputable sites that would be great!
     I also saw it was featured on OPRAH so maybe there is some truth to this lol.

     By acaiberry on December 31st, 2008 at 6:20 pm

Leave a Reply

The Archives

• » Syntagma's Flickr Photostream
• » Visit the Monthly Archives
• » Browse the Topics

Search the Network

• Use the form below to search the entire Syntagma Digital network.

Copyright © 2005-2007 Syntagma Media. All rights reserved. Design by Thord Daniel Hedengren