<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The York family Christmas card 2007</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.royalanecdotes.com/2007/12/18/the-york-family-christmas-card-2007/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.royalanecdotes.com/2007/12/18/the-york-family-christmas-card-2007/</link>
	<description>Royals, Royalty and British Monarchy by John Evans</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 01:03:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kit</title>
		<link>http://www.royalanecdotes.com/2007/12/18/the-york-family-christmas-card-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-28798</link>
		<dc:creator>Kit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Dec 2007 20:30:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.royalanecdotes.com/2007/12/18/the-york-family-christmas-card-2007/#comment-28798</guid>
		<description>has anyone noticed  the prince andrew/tony blair resemblance?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>has anyone noticed  the prince andrew/tony blair resemblance?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John</title>
		<link>http://www.royalanecdotes.com/2007/12/18/the-york-family-christmas-card-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-28642</link>
		<dc:creator>John</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 10:47:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.royalanecdotes.com/2007/12/18/the-york-family-christmas-card-2007/#comment-28642</guid>
		<description>Agreed. If you&#039;re a family comprising a Prince, a Duke, a Duchess and two Princesses, it smacks a little bit of inverted snobbery to try to appear so normal. Somewhere in between that and total formality would be better, I think.

But each to his own. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed. If you&#8217;re a family comprising a Prince, a Duke, a Duchess and two Princesses, it smacks a little bit of inverted snobbery to try to appear so normal. Somewhere in between that and total formality would be better, I think.</p>
<p>But each to his own. <img src='http://www.royalanecdotes.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Melissa</title>
		<link>http://www.royalanecdotes.com/2007/12/18/the-york-family-christmas-card-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-28631</link>
		<dc:creator>Melissa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 23:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.royalanecdotes.com/2007/12/18/the-york-family-christmas-card-2007/#comment-28631</guid>
		<description>I looked at this from the standpoint of who Prince Andrew&#039;s audience is i.e. those to whom he&#039;s sending photo-adorned Christmas cards. To that end, I think this is an unusual choice, as there must be all types of royals and aristocrats who are on the receiving end of this photo. I would have imagined something a little more sophisticated but to each his own, I guess.

I like the picture as a casual snapshot and think it has its charm. I&#039;m just surprised it&#039;s on the Christmas cards. Including the second photo on the flip side of the card is a bit of overkill though. 

My card must be lost in the mail. Drats. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I looked at this from the standpoint of who Prince Andrew&#8217;s audience is i.e. those to whom he&#8217;s sending photo-adorned Christmas cards. To that end, I think this is an unusual choice, as there must be all types of royals and aristocrats who are on the receiving end of this photo. I would have imagined something a little more sophisticated but to each his own, I guess.</p>
<p>I like the picture as a casual snapshot and think it has its charm. I&#8217;m just surprised it&#8217;s on the Christmas cards. Including the second photo on the flip side of the card is a bit of overkill though. </p>
<p>My card must be lost in the mail. Drats. <img src='http://www.royalanecdotes.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gigi</title>
		<link>http://www.royalanecdotes.com/2007/12/18/the-york-family-christmas-card-2007/comment-page-1/#comment-28630</link>
		<dc:creator>Gigi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 23:40:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.royalanecdotes.com/2007/12/18/the-york-family-christmas-card-2007/#comment-28630</guid>
		<description>ClassyCanuck, would they really go to all that trouble to manipulate the public over the perceived informality of a Christmas card photograph of Prince Andrew and his daughters?  If so, these people need to rethink their entire life focus!  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ClassyCanuck, would they really go to all that trouble to manipulate the public over the perceived informality of a Christmas card photograph of Prince Andrew and his daughters?  If so, these people need to rethink their entire life focus!  <img src='http://www.royalanecdotes.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
