http://www.royalanecdotes.com/2006/05/03/princess-michael-house-sold-and-a-toyboy-in-tow/ Royals, Royalty and British Monarchy by John Evans Sun, 05 Sep 2010 16:40:10 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 http://www.royalanecdotes.com/2006/05/03/princess-michael-house-sold-and-a-toyboy-in-tow/comment-page-1/#comment-993 Trudie Thu, 04 May 2006 11:21:22 +0000 http://www.royalanecdotes.com/2006/05/03/princess-michael-house-sold-and-a-toyboy-in-tow/#comment-993 Thanks for answering the question. our laws are somewhat similiar in that what was aquired before marriage and inheritance are not included only property aquired together during the marriage Thanks for answering the question. our laws are somewhat similiar in that what was aquired before marriage and inheritance are not included only property aquired together during the marriage

]]> http://www.royalanecdotes.com/2006/05/03/princess-michael-house-sold-and-a-toyboy-in-tow/comment-page-1/#comment-982 John Thu, 04 May 2006 07:43:31 +0000 http://www.royalanecdotes.com/2006/05/03/princess-michael-house-sold-and-a-toyboy-in-tow/#comment-982 Community property in the sense that many Royals will have antique furniture on loan from the store at Windsor Castle, and certainly Kensingtom Palace is public (i.e. Crown) property. But the Princess can expect to take 50% of what's his in any divorce settlement, except for Royal heirlooms which are always entailed in some way. Community property in the sense that many Royals will have antique furniture on loan from the store at Windsor Castle, and certainly Kensingtom Palace is public (i.e. Crown) property. But the Princess can expect to take 50% of what’s his in any divorce settlement, except for Royal heirlooms which are always entailed in some way.

]]> http://www.royalanecdotes.com/2006/05/03/princess-michael-house-sold-and-a-toyboy-in-tow/comment-page-1/#comment-967 Trudie Thu, 04 May 2006 01:18:46 +0000 http://www.royalanecdotes.com/2006/05/03/princess-michael-house-sold-and-a-toyboy-in-tow/#comment-967 John: I am sure the Queen would only be delighted as the rest of the family to finally be rid of that appalling woman. She has been the biggest embarassment with her arrogant attitude and money grubbing ways this latest indiscretion probably being the straw that breaks the camels back. I wonder if in Britain when a couple like the Kents divorce if there is such a thing as community property? John: I am sure the Queen would only be delighted as the rest of the family to finally be rid of that appalling woman. She has been the biggest embarassment with her arrogant attitude and money grubbing ways this latest indiscretion probably being the straw that breaks the camels back. I wonder if in Britain when a couple like the Kents divorce if there is such a thing as community property?

]]>