Queen Modest, Government Vain
William Rees-Mogg, former editor of The Times (London), now a veteran columnist and Lockean defender of liberty, writes, “Our Queen is modest, her Ministers are vain.”
He believes that in the run-up to the Queen’s 80th birthday on Friday, “we can begin to see we have been living through a great reign, comparable in length, but also in achievement, with the reigns of her predecessors, Queen Elizabeth I and Queen Victoria.”
Her style has been very different as befits a different age, but, says Rees-Mogg, “the Queen has won a historic battle of ideas by the strength of her personality and principles.”
When she came to the Throne, republicanism (anti-Monarchism) was in the ascendancy, coming mainly from the Left and based around social equality and a lack of deference to authority. In the post-war period “the constitutional structures of the Queen’s childhood were almost swept away. … Political correctness is almost the opposite of the principles on which children were educated in the Thirties. In a single bound we have gone from Rudyard Kipling’s poem “If” to gay partnerships.”
Then he returns to his main point: “One of her strengths is that she is more humble than her Ministers, which makes them look superficial. The Ministers are vain, the Monarch is modest. That is an unusual historic combination.”
More Rees-Mogg in future posts.






